Laserfiche WebLink
AUG 181982 <br />sa K5 1 bAGC 9 <br />Lengthy discussion followed regarding additional work <br />which would depend on the extent of the utilities <br />relocation. <br />Darrell E. McQueen, of Lloyd and Associates, Inc., <br />stated that as far as utilities relocation, that would not <br />be part of their inspection services.. This contract would <br />start with the Notice to Proceed. <br />Philip Lloyd, of Lloyd and Associates, Inc., affirmed <br />that their time would start up when the County's contract <br />commenced. <br />Jim Davis, Public Works Director, advised that the <br />County preferred to have the construction by DOT be <br />coordinated in with their construction; and Lloyd and <br />Associates would be working with DOT for a smooth <br />transition. <br />Commissioner Fletcher expressed concern about the court <br />appearances and conferences by the Engineer. <br />Engineer Lloyd commented that if they have to go to <br />court on behalf of the County, they want to be compensated. <br />Commissioner Fletcher next discussed the cost of <br />printing and reproduction of prints and felt 800 per print <br />was too high. <br />Mr. McQueen noted -that the cost of their sheets was 55C <br />each, but did not include the labor in the preparation of <br />the prints. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. It <br />was voted on and carried unanimously. <br />