My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/18/1982
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1982
>
8/18/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:39 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 2:20:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/18/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. King stated that Dennis. Ragsdale, of his <br />department, was the primary author of the plan, and <br />commended him for his work. <br />Discussion followed concerning minor corrections to be <br />made in the plan; appropriate language for the question to <br />be put to the voters; and of working with bond counsel. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Lyons, SECONDED <br />by Commissioner Fletcher, that the Board approve <br />the Beach Access & Development Plan, authorize <br />the Attorney to draft the appropriate language <br />in Resolution form to be put to the voters, <br />work with bond counsel, consider a preliminary <br />plan, and place this item on the next Agenda. <br />Commissioner Wodtke referred to the Committee for Beach <br />Preservation and wondered if they should.be involved in this <br />matter. <br />Commissioner Lyons felt that the purpose of the Beach <br />Preservation Committee was for beach restoration, and did <br />not really take into account the amount of beaches owned by <br />the County. <br />Commissioner Wodtke commented that he would advise the <br />Committee that they were not involved in this aspect. <br />Commissioner Bird inquired if there was a condemnation <br />process if an agreement could not be reached with an owner <br />of beachfront property. <br />Attorney Brandenburg stated that the County could use <br />condemnation but it must show some need. He explained that <br />they would go to the properties that were most suitable and <br />obtain options to buy properties after the bond issue was <br />approved - the options would have to be paid for "up front." <br />The Attorney stated he would look into this if the Board so <br />desired. On this type of a bond referendum, the Attorney <br />AUG 181982 so x 51 PkbE <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.