My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/15/1982
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1982
>
9/15/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2019 10:17:59 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 2:30:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/15/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TO: Honorable Members of DATE: September 2, 1982 - FILE: <br />Board of County Commissioners <br />THRU: Michael Wright <br />County Administrator <br />FROM: George Liner <br />Utilities Manaqer <br />DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS: <br />SUBJECT: The Meadows Franchise Application <br />REFERENCES: <br />The Meadows is a wasterwater franchise requested by FST Partnership <br />comprised of three parties; George Frederick, Earl Spytek, and Fred <br />Tuerpe. <br />The subdivision consists of 3.9 acres with two groups of two story buildings. <br />Eight Condo units upstairs and eight offices or shops downstairs each or <br />a total of sixteen condo and sixteen commercial units located off of 43rd <br />Avenue near S.W. 1st Street. Each pair of units (upstairs and downstairs) <br />will have its own well but the collective project requires a sewage treat- <br />ment plant - hence the need for a franchise. <br />The franchise was first applied for November 18-, 1981, by Paul Rosskamp <br />in behalf of the developer. Due to his -untimely death, the project had <br />been delayed to this time. We have the application package complete; <br />it was reviewed by staff and is ready to be presented to the board for <br />approval of the franchise. For this purpose, we must have the agenda <br />item approved and scheduled for a public hearing with sufficient time <br />allowed for the public notification fifteen (.15) days in advance of the <br />public hearing. <br />ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS: <br />Since this franchise was initiated quite some time aqo, the old format <br />for the resolution was negotiated, with all the features of the new <br />franchise incorporated. <br />These include: <br />1. A payment of.$1,000 to apply for the franchise. <br />2. System will be built to county specs and partnership shall follow <br />county regulations in maintaining and operating the system. As it is being <br />constructed, we'have the right to inspect. <br />3. We shall obtain engineers satisfaction and DER approval as to <br />construction and copies of "as -built" drawings.. <br />4. There is provision for a 3% fee to be paid to county based on <br />gross revenue. <br />5. A maintenance escrow fund is provided which can be adjusted by decision <br />of the Board. <br />6. If the partnership fails to comply with franchise conditions, the <br />Board, after a hearing can impose a $50 per day fine for noncompliance <br />and limit the franchise activity. <br />SEP 15 1982 21 <br />51 rm-3 0n <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.