Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Crago had no problem with that whatsoever; he was <br />concerned, however, that the Attorney's first recommendation <br />might establish a prior claim for one station. <br />Attorney Brandenburg pointed out that we have granted <br />one applicant a lease and then another, and we don't want <br />the first one coming back and saying we have destroyed his <br />interest. <br />Considerable discussion followed with the Attorney <br />stressing that all he would like is to have Mr. Crago agree <br />that WAXE has a responsibility under the FCC rules not to <br />interfere with the other station's signal. <br />The Board indicated that they wished to follow the <br />Attorney's recommendation.. <br />Mr. Crago continued to argue that he would prefer that <br />the County Commission simply indicate it is not responsible <br />for adjudicating any problems that may arise and not take <br />the position that one station has more responsibility than <br />the other. It concerned him that the FCC might require one <br />thing of them and the County Commission might require some- <br />thing different. <br />Attorney Brandenburg assured Mr. Crago there was no <br />concern in this regard since his suggestion merely was that <br />they would agree not to interfere with WGYL signals <br />according to FCC standards. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Lyons, _ <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Wodtke, to author- <br />ize the Chairman to sign a license agreement <br />with WAXE subject to the conditions suggested <br />by the Attorney. <br />Mr. Crago asked in the event he and Attorney <br />Brandenburg are able to agree to language that specifies <br />33 <br />SEP15 1982 <br />keg 51 wbc 29.0 <br />