My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/22/1982
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1982
>
9/22/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:40 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 2:31:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/22/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SEP 2 2 1982 <br />aux 51 P r.449 <br />Finance Director Barton reported that $107,000 is the <br />total price tag for Mr. Arden's proposal, including the <br />higher liability coverage and no deductible on the Errors & <br />Omissions policy, and he has agreed to go on a monthly <br />billing with no interest. <br />Commissioner Fletcher commented that previously we were <br />talking about going with Risk Management, and Mr. Barton <br />explained that their price was $111,000 and their proposal <br />did not have the limits we are talking about now. <br />Discussion followed on the point that last year's price <br />for our present insurance coverage was $123,000 and the <br />price just quoted for this year's is $107,000. Mr. Arden <br />explained that we are coming off some adverse years and now <br />have some years without some serious claims; it is mainly <br />related to liability. He explained the various factors on <br />which the rate is based and how these figures are updated. <br />Commissioner Lyons felt that this points but"how much <br />it pays for the Road & Bridge Department to be diligent in <br />replacing and repairing stop signs, traffic signals, etc. in <br />order to lessen our exposure to liability claims. <br />Attorney Brandenburg commented that last year's civil <br />rights liability coverage had an exclusion for issues that <br />involved the taking of property, etc., and he wished to be <br />sure the current policy includes this. He also wished to <br />know if the Errors & Omissions policy would apply in a <br />situation where a county employee makes an error that <br />damages the county and the county sues the employee. <br />Commissioner Wodtke also was concerned about civil <br />rights insurance and litigation associated with jails, and <br />wished to know if insurance is available that would cover <br />the County Commission if they are held responsible for <br />another Constitutional Officer's action or inaction in a <br />civil rights type of case. <br />68 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.