Laserfiche WebLink
OCT 61992 ' 451 tAa?i <br />than waiving it entirely; every agency must go through the <br />site plan process. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED <br />by Commissioner Lyons, that the Board accept <br />staff's recommendation for processing of site <br />plan approval on existing developments; that <br />the decision on building permit fees and slab <br />fees be delayed until staff has contacted the <br />City Building Director; and have a recommendation <br />at the next meeting for the Board. <br />Brief discussion ensued. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. It was <br />voted on and carried unanimously. <br />AGREEMENT WITH ARCHITECT REGARDING NEW JAIL <br />Attorney Brandenburg explained that this agreement had <br />been reviewed by the Public Safety Committee. He added that <br />there was a change to be made in the agreement in Section <br />1.7.5 regarding scope of services. <br />Roger Pierce, Vice President of W. R. Frizzell <br />Architects, Inc., came before the Board, and explained the <br />agreement, which was two -fold. They will do a study to <br />determine the size of facility the County would construct, <br />and they will do the architectural design work, with the <br />fees for the study to be credited if the facility is <br />constructed. <br />Attorney Brandenburg affirmed this fact by referring to <br />Section 15 in the agreement. In other words, the County <br />would pay $40,000 for a study determining the County's needs <br />for the next twenty years. When the County agrees to go <br />with their design of the jail, Frizzell Architects, Inc. <br />