Laserfiche WebLink
M M M <br />under contract to sell them this property and one of the <br />contingencies is that the property be rezoned. Mr. Evans <br />commented that, as an attorney, he has found that when <br />people come into a room such as this and sit on a jury, they <br />feel as if they are in a vacuum, and he wished them to face <br />up to the realities of the situation. Mr. Evans then <br />emphasized that efforts made over a 9 month period to sell <br />this property for industrial were unsuccessful; the fact <br />that Rampmaster is coming into the county obviously does not <br />mean that we are having rapid industrial growth. Attorney <br />Evans did not believe that Mr. Orth's grass strip airport is <br />an issue; they are not encroaching on Mr. Orth's land, and <br />although Mr. Orth may be hard to get along with, Mr. Evans <br />T •ar a� <br />believed the projects are compatible and can live together. <br />As to compatibility with light industry, Mr. Evans read from <br />the County Code the description of LM -1, which requires that <br />there be no objectionable noise, vibration, odors, air <br />pollution, etc., and also requires development standards <br />which assure an open uncrowded appearance. Mr. Evans noted <br />that the subjective theory proposed by the Planning staff <br />both contradicts a precedent that has already been voiced - <br />the fluidity of the node - and negates the policy of "first <br />come, first served." Mr. Evans did not see why the node <br />could not take shape around their property and stressed that <br />his group has been on the doorstep every chance they get. <br />They are designated MD -1; the MD -1 does cross I.95; the <br />benefits of an influx of retirees speak for themselves; and <br />Mr. Evans noted that all they are asking is that they be <br />allowed to do what it was indicated they could do. <br />Community Development Director Bruce King made the <br />presentation for the Planning staff. He eliminated the areas <br />of drainage and transportation as being potential issues and <br />also did not feel the airport is a primary issue. Mr. King <br />wished to resolve some of the ambiguities in the rezoning <br />54 <br />NOV 17 1982 K 2 P��r:V <br />