Laserfiche WebLink
1 •. <br />industrial node at the I-95 and 60 interchange. Planning <br />Manager Challacombe read from the July 29th Minutes, which <br />stated that staff had not recommended an increase in the <br />node, but merely that the acreage limitations on industrial <br />and commercial be removed; the size of the node to remain at <br />230 acres. <br />Commissioner Wodtke noted that Attachment D, Future <br />Land Uses, shows heavy commercial, industrial warehouses, <br />etc., and he believed it covers more than 230 acres. <br />Mr. King explained that this map actually includes <br />3,000 acres. They have allowed 60 acres for regional <br />commercial and 150 acres for highway commercial, which is <br />_ <br />in -filling between the current highway aY commercial <br />The <br />also allowed 140 acres for heavy commercial, and he believed <br />this trend n has been established by sitePP <br />lans approved <br />P <br />recently; . the MD residential covers 1,240 acres and mobile <br />home parks cover 950 acres. Mr. King discussed the concept <br />of the node and felt it is difficult to say that we are <br />going to establish a node at that particular intersection of <br />only 230 acres for industrial/commercial when the long term <br />potential is far greater. He further noted that there are <br />very few existing constraints on this node as there has not <br />been a great deal of development in this area. <br />Discussion continued at length in regard to the size <br />and shape of the node, which Mr. King felt would not be <br />round, but rather elongated on the east. As to .the size of <br />the area, he noted that what they have shown is approxi- <br />mately the same. as that area designated in the 1975 Plan. <br />Commissioner Wodtke emphasized that we did not adopt <br />the 1975 Plan and we must go by what we have on the books <br />now, which shows residential on the west side of I-95. <br />Chairman Scurlock felt the decision to move the MD over <br />to the West of I-95 was based partly on the fact that there <br />was an existing subdivision in that vicinity and also due to <br />68 <br />N OV 17 1982 ��-I <br />