My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/5/1983
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1983
>
1/5/1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:59 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 2:43:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/05/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION <br />Paul Austin Rezoning Request <br />ENVIRONMENT: <br />Subject property is not within a flood hazard area. It is presently <br />in groves with shrubs and other trees growing up between them. <br />There are no environmentally sensitive areas located within <br />the subject property. <br />LAND USE: <br />The adjacent property to the east on SR 60 is presently vacant and <br />zoned A, Agriculture. Property on SR 60 on the east side of 58th <br />Avenue is zoned C-1, Commercial. Commercial no <br />is located at the <br />intersection of 58th Avenue and SR 60. <br />58th Avenue directly :butts theRiviera Estates, facing <br />property <br />Estates contains ± 18.5 acres and72lots. The northern end. Riviera <br />approximately 3.9 units per acre. The subdivision aiseabout sSo% ity is <br />developed at this time. The property directly north of the subject <br />property is vacant and zoned R-1, Single Family (maximum 6.2 units/acre <br />The property on the west side of the subject property is zoned R -2B <br />Multiple Family (maximum 8 units/acre) and is presently vacant. <br />Approximately 413 feet west of the subject property on SR 60 is <br />Whistle Wood Lane. This area contains six lots with single family <br />houses. This subdivision is zoned R-1, Single Family District <br />(maximum 6.3 units/acre).and contains a platted density of one unit/ <br />7 acres. <br />It is anticipated that the ± 35 acre parcel on the northwest corner of <br />SR 60 and Kings Highway intersection will be rezoned and developed <br />as a part of the commercial node. The subject property and the 48 <br />acre parcel adjacent to it which is zoned R -2B, Multiple Family will <br />Provide an intermediate land use between the commercial uses in <br />the Node and the single-family residential uses located to the west. <br />The proposed multi -family development of the subject property will <br />interfacewith the single family subdivision Riviera Estates. Anv <br />potential negative impacts of traffic drainage or lack of visual <br />continuity can be mitigated through site plan design. <br />UTILITIES: <br />The applicant has submitted a development proposal for 50 multi -family <br />units (duplex and triplex units). The applicant proposes to use <br />individual well and septic systems to provide utility service <br />development. County water and sewer services to the <br />are not presently <br />available to this area. It is estimated that a 50 unit development <br />of this type would have an average daily water consumption of 17,500 <br />gallons per day. <br />TRAFFIC: <br />Although specific site plan design is not a factor in consideration <br />of rezoning request,, good planning practices would <br />prohibit ingress <br />and egress into a multi -family project through an existing single <br />family development; therefore, the traffic analysis is based on the <br />assumption that the subject property will have access to SR 60 only. <br />Ordinance No. 82-4 requires setbacks which allow the eventual <br />development of an access road along SR 60. A 50 unit, multi -family <br />development is anticipated to generate an additional 300average <br />daily trips (ADT). SR 60 presently has approximately 3,200 average <br />daily trips per day along the subject property. The proposed <br />development would add somewhat less than 7% increase of average daily <br />trips per day. Based on these assumptions, the volume capacity ratio <br />would be .29 or 29% of the existing capacity would be utilized. <br />Upon completion of the frontage road system, the traffic pattern would <br />be carried onto Kings Highway. Kings Highway is designated as•a- <br />secondary collector, while SR 60 is a major arterial. It is not <br />anticipatsithat the development of the subject property at maximum <br />density would have a significant traffic impact on SR 60. <br />65 <br />JA►N 1983 iK 4 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.