1/5/1983 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

J A N 5 19,83 BOK 52 rhu 5J 6 Attorney Michael Caravaglia, 3111 Cardinal Drive, came before the Board representing the applicant. He stated that Planning & Zoning Commission approved the R -2D requested. The property to the west is R -2B and to the east is Agricultural, but under the Land Use Plan, it has been designated part of the commercial node. He believed that one of the owners of the property to the east has indicated intentions of developing on a commercial basis and he, therefore, felt the best use of this property is R -2D. Community Development Director Bruce King wished it made clear that the Land Use Plan does not reflect a commercial node for the intersection of Kings Highway and SR 60 at this time, although there is the option that location may develop into a commercial node in the long term. Mr. King further noted that during site plan approval, which is required for multi -family development, staff will be looking for establishment of a non -access easement on the part that abuts Rivera Estate Subdivision. Commissioner Lyons questioned whether this narrow piece of property can be developed to provide access only to Highway 60, and Mr. King confirmed that it could be developed under multi -family and provide access. Commissioner Pletcher discussed the traffic generated by such a development and expressed concern about the possibility of using up all the capacity of SR 60 before.50% of the land is developed. He believed our Land Use Plan allows development in excess of the road's capabilities. Mr. King pointed out that these figures must relate to the entire road network and you must consider origin and goal of trips. Commissioner Pletcher wished to plan based on the worst case and felt we still do not have all the data we need. Administrator Wright noted that Mr. King will be working on this during the year with a computer, and