Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Lyons expressed concern as to how this <br />might affect large integrated developments which are done in <br />phases and felt they should be afforded some protection. <br />Mr. Kraft, of Hobart Landing Homeowners Association, <br />stated that he wrote his letter because they have been <br />living with a situation of unfinished development which <br />never seems to end, and their community has been more more <br />or less.destroyed cosmetically through would-be development.. <br />He believed substantial construction should include About <br />350 of construction on a large project and possibly 70% on a <br />small project. <br />Discussion followed on the possibility of some type of <br />administrative review of site plans annually. Commissioner <br />Fletcher felt the problem is figuring out the criteria for <br />the degree of completion. He believed if -you -were to use the <br />end.result value of the project, the percentage of value <br />completed might give some indication. It was agreed that we <br />need a clear'formula. <br />Art Wilson, developer of property near Hobart Landing, <br />objected to Mr. Kraft's implication that his development is <br />in a state that is detrimental to the community of Hobart <br />Landing. He stated that he has spent a very considerable <br />sum upon development; he has worked diligently and in good <br />faith; and he would like the Board to inspect the site and <br />assess it themselves. <br />It was explained that the Board is addressing a general <br />situation and trying to clarify the terminology in the <br />ordinance; we are not debating the merits -of a specific <br />situation. <br />Mr. Kraft offered the further thought that if a <br />development requires a package plant and there has been no <br />application to the. DER, this would be an indication that the <br />developer is not planning to build. He stated that his <br />45 <br />w 52 PAGE 753 <br />