Laserfiche WebLink
� MAR 2 1983 "f�vc90,3 <br />demonstrated to the Commission, and we went out on a limb to <br />try to provide this service. <br />Discussion continued at length regarding subdivisions <br />with existing systems and lines, some of which were never <br />cleared for service because no water taps were available, <br />and the fact that these must be pressure tested and brought <br />up to standards, which is not included in the impact fees. <br />It was felt our official policy should be written out and <br />made clear for the record. <br />Mr. Pinto felt it is very likely that it will not be <br />possible to bring some of the exisoting lines up to standards <br />and that new construction will have to take place. If we <br />reach that point, he felt the Utility Depament must handle <br />it. He recommended that in the meantime we move ahead with <br />Phase I, noting that we have the permit to build the project <br />with the understanding that the actual connections are not <br />part of this project and that any distribution system <br />connected must meet County standards. <br />Administrator Wright confirmed that we need to go ahead <br />and award the -bid, and Engineer Robbins reviewed the time <br />table involved with physically getting things constructed if <br />the bid'is awarded today. <br />Chairman Bird asked what would happen in the event we <br />did not go through with. Phase II, the sub -aqueous crossing, <br />and Attorney Brandenburg explained that we then would give <br />all improvements and the unused escrow funds to the City, <br />and they would pick up from there. <br />Question arose as to whether the people who connect <br />would have to pay the City connection fee, and Engineer <br />Robbins believed this is spelled out in the agreement. <br />49 <br />� r � <br />