Laserfiche WebLink
L-] <br />M <br />little as $1..00 if we wished to do so, after the County <br />determines it no longer needs the property for County <br />purposes <br />Commissioner Scurlock expressed his understanding of <br />the Humane Society's difficulties in their attempts to <br />acquire another location resulting in their serious recon- <br />sideration of this particular site. He suggested that the <br />County sell this tract with a reverter clause that once .it stops <br />being used as an animal control facility, it would revert <br />back to the County. He felt there is a legitimate need for <br />a new site location and that the County could offer its <br />support and assistance by selling the property to the Humane <br />Society. <br />Commissioner Wodtke felt it would be the ideal place <br />for the Humane Society if we could find a way to get some <br />water back in there, and was advised that the County could <br />run a water line from the Road and Bridge Department garage <br />to the new site. <br />Commissioner- Lyons stated that there is only a small <br />part of this property that is usable; it definitely would <br />not be lax'e enough to accommodate a new jail structure, and <br />he would certainly consider selling it to the Humane <br />Society. <br />Local architect Charles Block, speaking on behalf of <br />the Humane Society, explained the perimeters of the tract in <br />relationship to the landfill. He noted that the 5 acres <br />would allow for an open area around the structure and would <br />act as a buffer to some residential property down the road. <br />He believed 5 acres was sufficient for their needs. <br />Commissioner Lyons felt that the new location would <br />provide a place for livestock and horses that are occasion- <br />ally impounded and enable the Humane Society to provide for <br />all kinds and sizes of animals. <br />, <br />21 <br />