3/16/1983 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

F, MAR 16 1983 s3�za right-of-way. Also when the Schlitt family sold the Neteler (formerly Barth) property, the Schlitts did not deed the road right-of-way. As a result, all parties involved, namely the Sumerall's, Holloman's, Neteler's, and Schlitts have verbally agreed to donate any necessary right-of-way. The County has .hired Donald N. Schneider, Indian River Title Corporation to update a title search of the road right-of-way which the County originally had performed in the early 19601s. Once the ownership is established, the parties involved have verbally agreed to donate the necessary right-of-way. The title search is to be completed by Friday, March 18, 1983. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS The alternatives presented are as follows: Alternative # 1 Approve the preliminary assessment roll and adopt the authorizing reso- lution subject to all parties deeding the road right-of-way to the County by April 1, 1983: If the deeds are not executed by that date, the Project shall be terminated at the west property line of the Council on Aging property. Alternative # 2 1/1 Approve the preliminary assessment roll and authorizing resolution for the paving of 14th Street east of the west property line o� the Council on Aging property. Alternative # 3 Extend the public hearing to the next meeting of April' 6, 1983. RECOMMENIDATIONS AND FUNDING Since all parties which may hold title to the .road right-of-way have agreed to convey the necessary right-of-way, Alternative # 1 is recommended whereby the preliminary assessment roll and authorizing resolution be approved subject to right-of-way. Funding to be by the Petition Paving Fund, unencum- bered balance is approximately $100,000. Jim Davis, Public Works'Director, explained that this item was in continuance from the last meeting and the recommendation of staff was to follow Alternate #1 and terminate paving on the west property line of the Council on Aging property. This recommendation was due to the fact that the County does not have right-of-way from one of the property owners involved. Chairman Bird opened the Public Meeting and asked if anyone wished to be heard. William Caldwell, Attorney representing Tom Vara, who had previously dedicated over half of the property in the proposed project, stated he was confused as to why the County doesn't go ahead and get the additional right-of-way which the memo indicates people are willing to give. 28