My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/16/1983
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1983
>
3/16/1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:00 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 2:38:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/16/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
authority to require these items and they will not pursue <br />any action,'after this arrangement, to have a court declare <br />it otherwise. <br />Attorney Brandenburg noted that another situation is <br />the status of the grounds for the opening for the weekend. <br />Staff felt there were some hazardous situations existing <br />because of the construction debris and the extent to which <br />parts of the parking lot were not completed. Therefore, <br />prior to obtaining a C.O. on Super X, it would be necessary <br />for them to obtain standard barricades with flashing beacons <br />and install them in a manner approved by the Traffic <br />Engineering Department Department and also -clean up the site. In <br />addition, they would hold the County harmless from anything <br />resulting from the request for an early C.O.; and there <br />would be an understanding that there would be no more C.O.'s <br />issued, except for two small buildings under construction <br />now, without all improvements being completed - that being <br />the 10th Avenue extension particularly and the light that <br />was agreed on at -10th Avenue and the 16th Street <br />intersection. Also, the developer would agree to cooperate <br />in accompAlshing the Community Development Department flow- <br />through plan, if allowed by the DOT. <br />Attorney O'Ha4e commented that the developer does not <br />own the land between the two projects, but he will be glad <br />to cooperate. <br />Community Development Director King commented that he <br />also had been in contact with the DOT in regard to what they <br />would permit, and what they actually did say was they would <br />not permit a deceleration lane that does not conform to <br />their standards; however, 75-100' of full storage and a 150' <br />taper would be permitted by the DOT at such time that the <br />County had the necessary right-of-way to make the <br />installation. Mr. King continued that at the present time <br />we have basically 1701; so, at some futuxe date, should the <br />46 <br />tax <br />AG <br />MAR 16 1983 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.