My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/18/1983
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1983
>
5/18/1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:00 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 3:14:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/18/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MAY 18 1983 <br />At the time this portion of property is subdivided into <br />4 individual pieces of property, which will require <br />submittal of a subdivision application, the County would <br />like to see a non -access easement and would like to see <br />access gained through 44th Avenue so there would be no <br />driveways at all onto 43rd Ave. That is the condition <br />staff recommends for approval of the request. <br />Commissioner Wodtke asked Attorney Brandenburg if we <br />have the legal authority to require this and Attorney <br />Brandenburg stated that we have the legal ability to acquire <br />non -access easements when approving a subdivision; and legal <br />authority to disapprove the abandonment or make an <br />abandonment subject to retaining any reservations desired. <br />Discussion followed regarding compensation on R/W <br />abandonments, and the Attorney explained that when a <br />right-of-way is abandoned, that land reverts to the abutting <br />property owners from the center line of the former <br />right-of-way; the exception to that is when the original <br />road dedication itself contains a reverter in the case of <br />abandonment by County. Those type of reverters are no <br />longer permissible under our new subdivision ordinance and <br />would only occur in real old platted roads. He did not know <br />whether the County has established a firm policy in this <br />regard; this would be something the Commission would have to <br />decide. <br />Chairman Bird opened the Public Hearing and asked if <br />anyone wished to be heard. <br />Mr. Sid Lysne, father of tenants in common Dena Lysne <br />Rockey and Lynn Ann Lysne, addressed the Board and explained <br />that separation of ownership should have been done ten years <br />ago. He urged the County to release this abandonment and <br />requested that the Board approve the request today. <br />Commissioner Wodtke asked Mr. Lysne if he had any <br />problem with a deed restriction re access and Mr. Lysne <br />28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.