My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/18/1983
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1983
>
5/18/1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:00 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 3:14:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/18/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the plan is at a draft stage and has not yet been reviewed <br />by the full committee. Any proposed amendments would be <br />voted on at the Committee's June 2nd meeting at Indian River <br />Community College. Mr. King next reviewed the material in <br />his May 18th memo discussing policies that might require <br />some amendment or modification of the County's Comprehensive <br />Plan. <br />Administrator Wright wished to know why'we would be <br />required to amend our plan. <br />Sam Shannon of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning <br />Council explained the process whereby the committee is <br />established and then develops a report which contains a <br />management plan requiring certain kinds of implementation. <br />This report is sent to the Governor and Cabinet, and if they <br />concur with the management plan, then it will be the <br />responsibility of the local governments to amend their plans <br />to be in conformance or the state basically will take over <br />the implementation. <br />Discussion ensued regarding the fact that this would <br />not apply unless an area were actually designated an area of <br />critical concern, and Mr. Shannon noted that the Governor <br />and Cabinet can designate areas of critical concern but that <br />designation does not go into effect until the Legislature <br />has an opportunity to review their action. It will go into <br />effect, however, unless the Legislature takes action to deny <br />it. <br />Mr. King believed local governments would have about <br />six months to implement any requirements locally. At the <br />end of six months, their progress would be reviewed and <br />evaluated by the Department of Community Affairs, and if <br />significant progress had been made, that particular area <br />would not be recommended to the Governor as an area of <br />critical concern. <br />57 <br />4• I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.