Laserfiche WebLink
I MAY 25 1983 <br />effect. <br />lobbying. <br />W <br />She again urged that the County join in such <br />Commissioner Scurlock asked if the Motion on the floor <br />was to pursue deletion from the Committee both with the <br />Committee and the Governor, and Commissioner Wodtke <br />confirmed that was the intent. <br />Robert Reider of the Vero Beach Civic Association <br />wished to bring into focus something overlooked so far, <br />which is that the Florida Statute that calls for <br />Comprehensive Plans calls for coordination of these plans <br />with the comprehensive plans of adjacent municipalities and <br />with the state comprehensive plan. The Coastal Zone <br />Management Plan also talks about adjoining counties. We, <br />therefore, are concerned with St. Lucie County because we <br />are adjacent. <br />Discussion again arose re our previous Resolution to <br />the Governor asking to be deleted, and Attorney Brandenburg <br />clarified that the Resolution asked to be included only to <br />the extent of the emergency transportation aspects. This <br />request was rejected, and he did not feel asking for <br />reconsideration -will do any good. <br />Ruth Stanbridge of the Florida Game and Fish Commission. <br />stated that for the past six years she has seen these study <br />areas all over the southern areas of the state. She <br />believed Indian River County was considered because we do <br />share the barrier islands with St. Lucie County. Mrs. <br />Stanbridge emphasized that the state does not just <br />arbitrarily go.in and say this is an area of critical <br />concern. She did not believe we have anything to fear from <br />the State and felt they are just making sure that we are <br />safe guarded because we have done our Comprehensive Plan so <br />well. <br />Attorney Byron T. Cooksey cautioned the Board to <br />24 <br />