Laserfiche WebLink
MAY 2 5 1993 <br />current information, he did not feel it would be feasible to <br />go through the document line by line and rewrite the <br />proposed plan this morning and, in fact, believed that would <br />be the worst thing we could do. He emphasized that he <br />personally felt the goal of this meeting should be not only <br />to receive comment from the.public but ask for an extension <br />of 30 to 60 days. Commissioner Scurlock did not feel the <br />proposed plan was completely bad, but felt strongly that <br />this whole thing has gained momentum too fast, and he <br />objected to the whole approach. As he understood it, the <br />comments are due tomorrow. <br />Commissioner Lyons supported Commissioner Scurlock's <br />position, but stated he would like to hear what those <br />present have to say, then get it all together in some sort <br />of a written fashion, and have another meeting when this is <br />all consolidated to make it our official position. <br />The Board had questions as to whether the committee <br />itself actually had drafted the proposed document, and <br />Community Development Director King explained that the <br />technical representatives from each jurisdiction had input <br />and reviewed.the drafts; but the work primarily was <br />performed by the Regional Planning Council. <br />Commissioner Scurlock noted that although Mr. King, as <br />a professional, has the ability to address many of these <br />items, the Board has not established any policy as yet. <br />Mr. King explained that the Commission does not really <br />have direct input - they appoint two representatives, who <br />help formulate the plan and then the full committee votes on <br />it, and that is why he came to the Commission for a <br />directive as to what position they wished to take. <br />Commissioner Scurlock felt it was unbelievable that <br />something as important as the transfer of development <br />rights, for instance, would take on an entirely different <br />4 <br />