Laserfiche WebLink
light from how each county has dealt with it in their own <br />Comprehensive Plans. <br />Mr. King stated explained they were concerned about <br />development of the island in total and wanted to establish <br />uniform standards and this was a compromise. <br />The Board felt that zero transfer is a strange <br />compromise. <br />The Board continued to discuss the need for an <br />extension of time, whether or not it would be allowed by the <br />committee which has many state representatives on it, and <br />the importance of developing some comment and input in the <br />event an extension were not allowed. The possibility of a <br />lawsuit to enjoin the state from taking action before we <br />r have sufficient time to develop comment on the plan was <br />suggested, but it was generally felt this was a very dubious <br />possibility. <br />The Chairman asked the Community Development Director <br />to give the Board a brief overview of. the Management Plan. <br />Mr. King proceeded to review the effects of the Growth <br />Management Plan as it relates to policies the County does <br />not presently have. <br />Use of the Shoreline <br />Page 15, line 3. The plan proposes to establish a <br />priority list for future use of the shoreline, both ocean <br />and riverside. <br />Dune Preservation Zone <br />Page 17, line 15. This would be another new policy for <br />the County and would establish a "dune preservation zone" <br />landward of the Coastal Construction Control Line, which <br />would restrict development and access along the beach/dune <br />system. Mr. King explained that staff would analyze and <br />make recommendations on the size of the proposed zone. <br />Another matter that arises is whether within that zone there <br />5 <br />MAY 2 5 1983 <br />'d®DK i-LIJ PAGE 576 <br />