6/15/1983 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

believed the whole issue was whether it shall be multi- family or single family and the density, and stated he was prepared to make a decision on that basis. Commissioner Lyons noted that since they want to explore all the alternatives to develop this property compatibly, he did not want to deny them the opportunity. Chairman Bird asked if anyone wished to be heard on this matter. Mr. Henry Muller of Cutlass Cove Dr. informed the Board that he is the largest property owner adjoining the property in question, both to the south and across AIA, and he has never been contacted by anyone representing Mr. Foreman in regard to what they are planning to do. He felt that it was a absolute misstatement of fact that every attempt has been made to contact and work with the -people who are affected by the decision, and he, therefore, objected to any postponement of the rezoning appeal. Mr. Cooksey stated that they would be delighted to work with Mr. Muller. Mr. George Bunnell of Beachcomber Lane in Indian River Shores addressed the Board and stated the. County has very diligently and very kindly insisted from the beginning that the people and the government of Indian River Shores come forth with their feelings and comments on this matter and they have done just that. They are now prepared to present the feelings of individuals, of the property owners association, the authors of the Indian River Shores•Master Plan, the Zoning Board, the Indian River Shores Council; and to present a separate study by the Town Manager -- all in an attempt to prove to the Commission that an upward rezoning is not in the interest of the County nor in the interest of Indian River Shores. Mr. Bunnell felt that if the owner is allowed to waive the 45 -day repeal requirement and the people objecting to 35 WK 53 PAGE 72,5 JUN 15 1983