7/6/1983 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

� � r pointed out that no matter what route we take, we still will be faced with the same allocation. Mr. Pinto continued that if Alternate 8 is chosen, he still is planning to sit down with 6th Avenue developers and say here is what is left and if you want it, -you will have to contribute, i.e., they would have to pay their portion of the construction of the line on 6th Avenue, the impact fees, and the service charges just as if they were connected, which is the only way, in his opinion, they could reserve that capacity. Commissioner Scurlock brought up the possibility of expanding the allocation from Vero Beach and asked if the line would have the physical ability to.carry additional capacity. Mr. Pinto explained that since we are looking to design the line for the flow to be reversed, he would like to size it to take the entire area. He did not feel the line size is a big problem. Commissioner Scurlock noted that while he originally was convinced that Alternate 5 was the best option, after listening to staff's reasoning, he now feels that Alternate 8 is by far the best decision, based on our setting a firm policy as to dispensing the capacity and also immediately contacting the City for an additional allocation. Lengthy discussion ensued as to a "first come, first served" policy for those who put up the money and are willing to meet the requirements. It was again emphasized that our first commitment is to the Ixora/Treasure Coast areas, and question arose as to any undeveloped lots in those areas. Mr. Pinto noted that the line is designed to take the full capacity of their plants which were designed to take the full capacity of those developments, but he felt any undeveloped lots in those areas should be on a first come, first served basis just the same as all others. He further 33 UL 6 1983 53 ?AU 9 J