Laserfiche WebLink
FF_ <br />JUL 6 1983 aK � &+Q <br />it necessary for the County to initiate the activities by <br />indicating to the staff that we want it to be considered. <br />He felt that we would not be taking a position for or <br />against, but just initiating its presentation. After public <br />hearings are held, the zoning will either remain LD -2, or be <br />modified to LD -1. <br />In discussion, Chairman Bird asked Director King if a <br />comparison would take place between the County's land uses <br />in the area and the adjacent land uses in Indian River <br />Shores and then meld the two together and come back to a <br />public hearing with a recommendation as to whether staff <br />feels that the changes are in order or not, and we will <br />address them at that time. Director King concurred that the <br />affected property owners and the Town of Indian River Shores <br />would have an opportunity to be heard. <br />Commissioner Wodtke pointed out that the enclaves were <br />not created by the County, they were created by the Town of <br />Indian River Shores. He pointed out that the town is <br />basically requesting that the County Comprehensive Plan be <br />adjusted to provide future land use for County enclaves that <br />are consistent with their community. He felt that it could <br />very well work the opposite, that perhaps the Town of Indian <br />River Shores could adjust their Comprehensive Plan to our <br />future land use. Commissioner Wodtke regretted the <br />existence of the enclaves and wished they had never been <br />allowed to happen. <br />Commissioner Lyons asked if we had set a certain time <br />sequence in connection with the annual -review of the <br />Comprehensive Plan. Bruce King explained that the Compre- <br />hensive Plan specifies that in the beginning of each <br />calendar year the County will consider amending the land use <br />plan. However, the staff was very busy in January, but have <br />since developed the amendment procedures. He reported that <br />even the amendments that came in after the deadline are <br />40 <br />