Laserfiche WebLink
AUG 3 198, <br />, 4 Pact ,- <br />MINOR SITE PLAN APPEAL - THOMAS BEATTY <br />The Board reviewed the following memo dated 7/26/83: <br />Tr)- DATE: FILE: <br />The Honorable Members of <br />the Board of County <br />Commissioners <br />July 26, 1983. <br />SP -82-04-060 <br />DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE: <br />SUBJECT: BEATTY MINOR SITE PLAN <br />APPEAL <br />atrick Bruce King, ICP <br />Community Development Div. Director <br />FROM: REFERENCES: <br />Bob Keating, AICP..14� Beatty Appeal <br />Planning & Zoning Mgr. WORKB , <br />it is requested that the data herein presented be given -formal <br />consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their <br />regular meeting of August 3, 1983. <br />DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS 1. <br />Thomas Beatty, 1486 Pelican Lane, first approached the Zoning <br />Department in February of 1983 to obtain an after -the -fact <br />permit for a six foot, front yard fence and a permit for a six <br />foot fence surrounding the remainder of his property. Since his <br />fence would exceed the height limitations for front..(3 feet) and <br />side yard (5 feet) fences, as specified in the Zoning Code, a <br />permit could not.be issued. Mr. Beatty was then incorrectly <br />advised by the Zoning Department staff to submit a variance <br />request for the fence. <br />After submitting a variance request, Mr: Beatty was informed <br />that the correct procedure for obtaining approval for a fence <br />which exceeds the height limitations of the Zoning'Code is to <br />submit a minor site plan request. Mr. Beatty then submitted a <br />minor site plan application for approval of a six foot. cedar <br />fence, a portion of which had already been constructed without a <br />permit, to completely surround his property. The subject <br />property is located within the R-lA, Single -Family Reni.dential. <br />Zoning District. <br />40 <br />