My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/21/1983
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1983
>
9/21/1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:02 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 3:14:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/21/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
142
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the Comprehensive Plan by redesignating a piece -here and a <br />piece there. She was also concerned that it was felt that <br />almost anything could be done at site plan and advised that <br />the property was a single plot and was given setbacks; <br />everything within those setbacks can be used in that <br />development. She thought that was something to be kept in <br />mind. She was also concerned with: how many acres we were <br />going to end up,w,th and what was going to happen to that <br />bank. As of right now, theoretically, the bank is <br />non -conforming as it is not included in this area at all. <br />Commissioner Lyons stated that they are going to <br />discuss this matter at the Planning & Zoning meeting and <br />felt we should have a workshop to set some policy as this <br />question is being raised continuously. Basically, he felt <br />that everyone knows what needs to be done, but the question <br />is how-. Todays's request is a prime example of this <br />problem. Personally, he would like to see this matter held <br />up until we set some policy and then consider it again. <br />Richard Shearer, Planner, said that staff has a problem <br />with this as there are two separate proposals: the subject <br />property involved here, which is 10.25 acres, and the <br />northern parcel, which is about 8 acres. The northern <br />8 -acre parcel was included as a neighborhood node request. <br />The total acres would be a little over 18 acres. Staff <br />feelings are that it would be appropriate to have a neigh- <br />borhood node to be located here (on map), but we are not <br />concerned with that today. Then there is the out parcel <br />where the Barnett Bank owns property, but has not yet built <br />a bank. <br />Commissioner Scurlock felt he could go with the node <br />concept, but could not see creating another one. <br />Robert Gaskill believed that this was the only on-going <br />project of this type in Indian River County. It was planned <br />back in 1972 and it has been built out the way Vista <br />69 <br />SEP 211983 K 4 Esc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.