Laserfiche WebLink
r -- <br />Administrator Wright informed the Board that he has <br />been negotiating with Property Appraiser Nolte and reached a <br />tentative agreement to use his computer and spin off of the <br />land records base he has now to bring our Building <br />Department and Planning records into one computerized <br />system. He believed this should be in place this year and <br />that it will provide a speeded up process. <br />Commissioner Scurlock wished to know how much time'it <br />actually would take if someone took the most efficient way <br />to go through the process. <br />Planner Clare Poupard added up the times listed and <br />came up with 148 days, or four to five months, to complete <br />the five major steps with the necessary in-house review. <br />She pointed out that the chart represents the new <br />procedures, and the new Subdivision Ordinance includes two <br />more steps that require staff review. <br />Commissioner Scurlock asked if the existing process <br />involves less or more time, and Planner Poupard believed it <br />takes two months or so for preliminary and about the same <br />for final, or four to five months. <br />Commissioner Scurlock asked what problem it would <br />create for us if staff does not meet the timeframes set out. <br />Attorney Brandenburg stated that the Ordinance does not <br />have timeframes that are to be met by staff. He believed <br />the projected timeframes are outside time.frames and on many <br />occasions the time actually involved would be much less. <br />Commissioner Scurlock felt the fact that the timeframes <br />are set out gives the developer a legitimate cause to <br />complain if we say it will take five days and it takes 15 <br />and noted that it certainly puts pressure on the staff to <br />move along. <br />Commissioner Lyons felt it puts everyone in a better <br />position so that they know when things should be done. <br />23 <br />OCT 12 1983 <br />56 ma 23 <br />I <br />