10/12/1983 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

OCT 121983 the area and that she did not want to see the area just covered with little houses. Commissioner Wodtke believed that in the coming year when we address the new PUD ordinance, there will be another process by which Mr. Cole can address his project. In such a process possibly the 90 acres could be forever designated for a golf course, and it could be given consideration on a contractual basis. Today, however, we are being asked to make a blanket change in an area that Commissioner Wodtke did not feel is ready for it. He asked staff whether under a PUD something similar to what is being requested could occur in an LD -1 area and not be restricted only to single family. Attorney Brandenburg replied that would be the way staff will propose it, but he did not know at this point if the Board would agree to it. In each District, this type of approach would be a conditional use. Mr. Tillis also stressed that when you consider the area which will be used for roads, lakes, golf course, etc., this actually will be an open rural area. He asked whether Mr. Cole knows of the proposed PUD ordinance, and Mrs. Eggert, Chairman of the Planning & Zoning Commission, indicated that Mr. Cole is aware of it. Attorney Brandenburg felt there is some misunder- standing in regard to -the proposed density and the area subtracted for the golf course, roads, etc. He noted that if you have a project of about 600 units on 150 acres and take out 90 acres for a golf course and 10 for roads, you then would have 600 units on 50 acres, or over 10 units per acre, which certainly would not be compatible with the rural nature of this area. David Dorrall, who lives about half a mile from the subject property, stated that he agreed with Mr. Tillis in a way, but pointed out there is no law that says Mr. Cole has 32