Laserfiche WebLink
OCT 12 1983 ft 55 ma 42 <br />rezoning of this property to make it more compatible with <br />the surrounding area. <br />Mr. Sabonjohn continued to argue that there are <br />commercial uses in his area and that businesses such as <br />Babcock's and Scotty's, which are in commercial areas, store <br />materials. <br />Mr. Keating explained that if you have a commercial <br />business, you can have storage in relation to it. You <br />cannot have it as a primary use, and it must be enclosed <br />storage. <br />Mr. Sabonjohn noted that Babcock's and Scotty's have <br />storage areas that are not enclosed. <br />Discussion followed as to the action taken by the Code <br />Enforcement Board, which is requiring that the mobile home <br />be moved, and also as to whether or not there were illegal <br />uses of the land at the time of adoption of the Compre- <br />hensive Plan. <br />Further discussion ensued on the Board's efforts to <br />eliminate strip zoning and staff's finding that while there <br />is commercial zoning in the area, there are very few <br />existing commercial uses. <br />The Chairman asked if anyone present wished to be <br />heard. <br />Don Coffey of Coffey Construction informed the Board <br />L <br />that he is located right across the street from Mr. <br />Sabonjohn; his property is zoned C-1; and he is <br />grandfathered in because he was operating a legitimate <br />business at the time of the proposed change. Mr. Coffey <br />testified that people do live in the mobile home on the <br />Sabonjohn property and they come and go. He agreed that C-1 <br />does not allow storage and stated that the way the Building <br />Department explained it to him was that it has to be either <br />under roof or in constant usage. Mr. Coffey continued that <br />he was neither for nor against Mr. Sabonjohn's request; he <br />42 <br />