My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/19/1983
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1983
>
10/19/1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:02 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 3:39:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/19/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Bowman, the Board <br />unanimously approved the renewal of a <br />concealed pistol permit for the following <br />persons: <br />Ferdinand Kulima <br />Sylvester S. Strang <br />B. Request for approval of Renewal Application for a Ptarmit <br />to Carry a Concealed Firearm: <br />The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/5/83: <br />TO: The Honorable Members of DATE: Sept. 26, 1983 FILE: <br />the Board of County Commissioners <br />FROM: Michael Wri <br />County Admi <br />SUBJECT: PISTOL PERMIT APPLICATION - <br />RENEWAL <br />REFERENCES: <br />Lawrence Ramsey is re -applying for renewal of a <br />pistol permit. Mr. Ramsey originally sought a weapons <br />permit in January, 1983 but was turned down by the County <br />T Commission after.I recommended denial of the.application. <br />My recommendation was based upon the fact Mr. Ramsey's <br />original application listed no arrests other than traffic <br />violations. A records check revealed several misdemeanor <br />and felony arrests over a period of 15 years. However, the <br />only conviction in the record appears to be a 1965 disorder- <br />ly conduct case. in which he was fined $10.00. <br />At no time was the reason for wanting a weapons permit <br />ever an issue. Under our current procedures, the mere <br />statement of needing a concealed weapon for "self protection" <br />satisfies the requirement of why an applicant needs a con- <br />cealed weapon. <br />With the revised application, Mr. Ramsey has apparently <br />met all the requirements of the ordinance. <br />5 <br />OCT 15 198 yam. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.