My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/9/1983
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1983
>
11/9/1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:02 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 3:40:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/09/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NOV 9 1983 <br />5 �a X73 <br />reasonable, and Chairman Bird felt it was as long as the <br />structure is at least as water conservative oriented as the <br />one originally proposed. <br />PROPOSED WATER AGREEMENT DISCUSSION <br />Chairman Bird opened discussion on the proposed water <br />agreement as explained in the following staff memo: <br />TO: The Honorable Members of DATE: October 25, 1983 FILE: <br />the Board of County Commissioners <br />THROUGH: Michael Wright � <br />County Administrator SUBJECT:GENERAL DEVELOPMENT UTILITIES <br />WATER AGREEMENT <br />Water Agreement between <br />FROM: Terrance G. Pint REFERENCES: General Development Utilities <br />Utility Services Director & Indian River County <br />DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: <br />General Development Utilities, Inc., in.making an application for a <br />rate increase, has expressed a desire to build a new water treatment <br />plant. <br />Staff recognizes that if GDU was permitted to build this new water <br />plant, it would drastically increase the rates of their existing - <br />customers. <br />Staff believes that if GDU purchases water from the County, it <br />would be a much more cost effective method for supplying the <br />Vero Highlands and Vero Shores area with water. <br />The proposed agreement addresses all of the concerns that the County <br />would have in protecting the interests of all other utility customers. <br />ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSES: <br />To not service this area with County water and to allow GDU to <br />provide their customers with water by meeting whatever requirements <br />are imposed upon them by other regulatory agencies or -to allow the <br />County to provide water charging appropriate rates and impact fees. <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />Staff recommends the County supply water to GDU under terms of'the <br />attached agreement which we feel would be in the best interests <br />of the residents within the GDU area and other County utility <br />customers. <br />Administrator Wright noted that GDU has one of two <br />options to improve the quality of the water — either to buy <br />processed reverse osmosis water on a wholesale basis from <br />the county or to construct a new type of treatment facility <br />NK <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.