My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/15/1984
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1984
>
2/15/1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:23 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 3:51:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/15/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
F E B 15 1994 <br />BOOR U PAGE4 <br />Commissioner Bird asked if the water transfer is <br />approved and we transfer the existing customers and the <br />vested customers who have paid their reservation charge but <br />have not yet received service, what happens to the remainder <br />of the undeveloped, unvested County property in the South <br />Beach area, as far as the City agreeing to serve these areas <br />with future connections. <br />Administrator Wright explained that all the people who <br />have paid connection fees have availability to water. If <br />the South Beach area is annexed, the City would service the <br />area. If it is not annexed, we would be in a position to <br />either go with something similar to North Beach Water, or it <br />would be the responsibility of the individual developers. <br />Chairman Scurlock stressed that there is no <br />economically feasible vehicle other than the City of Vero <br />Beach to service the South Beach area, and Administrator <br />Wright agreed that even if the South Beach is not annexed, <br />they would encourage the City to take the area into their <br />service area. <br />Utilities Director Pinto pointed out that the agreement <br />states that not only does the County relinquish or turn over <br />to the City the present assets we_have, but the entire South <br />Beach becomes the service area of the City. <br />The Board discussed the pros and cons of the transfer <br />and agreed that the City of Vero Beach could best serve the <br />area. <br />Commissioner Bird did have some reservations about what <br />we are doing to the remaining undeveloped property owners <br />who are not vested. <br />Utilities Director Pinto believed that the County would <br />be really putting them in a much better position as far as <br />the possibilities of getting water to them. He explained <br />that if County were to build the river -crossing, the only <br />people who would benefit would be the 1280 new customers at <br />30 <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.