Laserfiche WebLink
Attorney_Brandenburg stressed that once the County <br />signs the consent form, we will have no further say; so to <br />his way of thinking, the matter of the park should be. <br />resolved now. <br />The subject of zoning arose, and Attorney Vitunac <br />believed the County will have to rely on the historical <br />cooperation between the City and the County and also the <br />fact that the County has certain -rights with the <br />Legislature. <br />Lengthy discussion ensued surrounding the fact that <br />Councils change and Commissions change, and the Board felt <br />there should be some agreement spelled out regarding future <br />development of the park area. <br />Attorney Vitunac informed the Board that he personally <br />would be pleased to deliver a letter setting out the Board's <br />feelings to the City and its annexation study committee. <br />Discussion ensued as to the percentage of this area <br />owned by registered voters, and Attorney Vitunac stated that <br />actually only 17% of the owners are registered to vote. <br />Commissioner Wodtke noted that apparently the county's area <br />accounts for about 12% of the requirement, and he personally <br />would prefer to wait until the consent cards are returned <br />and learn the actual percentage of those interested in <br />taking this to a vote rather than have the County be the one <br />to put this over the 50%. <br />Discussion followed as to the fact that many of the <br />registered electors either live on small lots or in condos, <br />and some are not property owners. <br />Attorney Vitunac reported that the cards should be in <br />by March 5th. He emphasized that all the City wants to do <br />is give the people their vote on the issue. <br />Commissioner Bird stated that he was all in favor of <br />that, but he is concerned about the County park. <br />17 <br />FEB 2 2 1984 BOOK PACE217 <br />