Laserfiche WebLink
way that will not harm the environment any more than a <br />multitude of single family homes. <br />Discussion followed as to the density that would-be <br />allowed under single family development and the number of <br />septic tanks and wells that would result. It was -noted that <br />with multiple family development, we have more control <br />because it falls under site plan review criteria where we <br />can provide for more open space and give the environment <br />more consideration. <br />Planning Manager Keating confirmed.that in the site <br />plan review process, we can assure there won't be adverse <br />affects re run-offs_, etc. He also wished to point out that <br />with the current zoning the property is unusable; it cannot <br />be used for commercial purposes because of the Land Use <br />designation. This is an issue that would be coming up <br />during administrative rezonings, and he believed staff would <br />have made the same recommendation that the applicant is re- <br />questing. <br />Commissioner Lyons stated that while he would like to <br />see a lower density, the change to the density requested is <br />an improvement and he planned to vote for it. <br />Commissioner Bowman wished to know, in regard to the <br />environmentally sensitive area, how many units actually will <br />be built. <br />It was noted that there are approximately 3-1/4 <br />acres west of Indian River Drive. This acreage times <br />8 would be about 26 units maximum. <br />Commissioner Bowman noted there is land that is only at <br />8' elevation, and she believed the structures will have to <br />go on stilts. <br />Comment was made that buildings on the east half of <br />the property would have to be on stilts. <br />Environmental Planner Challacombe informed the Board <br />that a Type B stormwater management permit will be required, <br />31 <br />FEB 2 2 1984 <br />