My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/22/1984
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1984
>
2/22/1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:23 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 4:34:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/22/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FEB 2 2 1994 <br />BOOK 5 G, PACE 230 <br />Daniel Grumsby, Bay Street, Roseland, informed the <br />.Board that he owns property on Dixie Highway adjoining the <br />subject property on the north. He bought this property with <br />the understanding that it was zoned for 8 units to the acre <br />and this is what he intends to use it for. He also repre- <br />sents Carol Ashe who has a piece of property adjoining on <br />the north, and they agree that the use of the property as <br />presently zoned would be a good use of this land. <br />L. J. Berry, informed the Board that he lives just <br />south of the subject property in the Indian River Mobile <br />Home Park, and his sister-in-law has a house to the south of <br />the proposed development on old Dixie Highway. They both <br />believe that R -2B is the best improvement we can go for in <br />this area. <br />The Chairman determined that no one else wished to be <br />heard. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Lyons, SECONDED <br />by Commissioner Wodtke, the.Board unanimously <br />closed the public hearing. <br />Commissioner Bird noted that this was a compromise at <br />the time the Board set up the MD-l'designation. The <br />property was a mixture of zones, but -it was predominantly <br />R-2 (15 units per acre), and Commercial. It was the <br />Commission's thought that property owners up there had a <br />certain investment in their property on which they had paid <br />pretty high taxes on over the years, and the R -2B was <br />thought of as a compromise to allow them a reasonable use of <br />their property and still establish a use that would be <br />compatible with the single family use of the remainder of <br />the neighborhood. He.did not feel it would be fair to <br />change the pattern established at that time based on what we <br />have heard today and believed the project can be done in a <br />30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.