2/29/1984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Attorney Brandenburg reported that as a result of the meeting, Attorney Vitunac expressed his doubts whether an agreement could be formulated which he would feel comfortable advising the City that it was legal and binding. _ Attorney Brandenburg distributed copies of the proposed agreement that he had prepared for Attorney Vitunac to present to the City Council. After reviewing the provisions of the proposed agreement, the County Attorney stated that if the City should not feel comfortable with this agreement or a similar agreement, then it would be his recommendation for the County not to agree to annexation of the park property. Commissioner Bird felt the agreement should include a provision that when the County does develop the park, that City utilities will be available. He did not feel that it makes sense for the County to have to go in and provide some sort of package plant at that time since the park would be surrounded by City water service. Attorney Brandenburg stated that he had considered including such a provision, but did not do so, as he believed the City could not make a decision on future water capacity or service at this time. He felt it would;be appropriate that the City agree to plan its public improvements in such a manner that it would enhance the park rather than to detract from it. Commissioner Bird felt that the matter should at least be discussed now so that the City can keep in mind the future development of the park relative to sizing of their future utility lines, capacities, etc. #�P3 - Water Service to the South Beach Area Attorney Brandenburg recalled that the County has an i agreement with tAe City regarding water service to the South Beach area and the County attempting to build a sub -aqueous crossing. That agreement provides that if the County 5 FEB 29 1984 ow 56 PACEC