3/14/1984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MAR 14 194 Btax 56 PA6f. 2 apartment or a condominium, the internal driveway isles and streets.are not usually dedicated to the public and they are considered part of the gross acreage. In a subdivision, the Zoning Code specifies minimum lot sizes, so the rights of way would not be considered. There are several other situations that are comparable to this. In essence, what we are saying in this proposed amendment is really not that the density would be transferred, but when it is considered, the total acreage would include the right-of-way. Commissioner Lyons felt this apparently is not inconsistent with what we are doing now, and Chairman Scurlock believed the ordinance to be helpful in building roads and should have been considered long before this. Commissioner Wodtke asked if this ordinance would have applied to the recent right-of-way donation on the east side of the Vista Properties project out on SR #60. Director Keating explained that this ordinance would not have affected that project because we would have asked for the right-of-way dedication for the entire parcel at the time of site plan approval. The big difference in extending Indian River Boulevard is that we are asking for all the right-of-way now, and a lot of the parcels are not ready for development. Commissioner Wodtke felt this ordinance would work to the County's benefit and would encourage the dedication of land. Question was raised as to how the application of this ordinance would affect commercial and industrial acreage, and after some discussion it was generally agreed that staff should look into this further. 6 Attorney Brandenburg suggested the insertion of and accepted by the County in the first sentence of Section 1 on Page 1 of the ordinance so that the sentence would read: All land area requested by the County for street or road 31