My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/21/1984
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1984
>
3/21/1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:23 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 4:38:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/21/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
View images
View plain text
MAR 211984 <br />BOOK 56 PAGE 463 <br />Mr. Shearer agreed that there is more latitude in an <br />MXD, but felt it would be considered spot zoning when you <br />rezone just one small piece of property. <br />Commissioner Wodtke asked about considering allowing <br />the tire store in C-lA as an exception. He believed we have <br />an asphalt company in C-lA in this area. <br />Mr. Shearer noted that asphalt company went in as an <br />office, but now they are using it more as a yard than an <br />office, which really is not in conformance with the zoning. <br />He stated that staff does have a problem with allowing a <br />tire store in C -1A, and if the Board does wish to allow the <br />rezoning to C-1, they would prefer to see additional <br />property in the area rezoned to C-1. <br />Commissioner Wodtke could not see that a tire store <br />would be wrong for this area, considering what is already <br />there, and if a tire store can't locate on Old Dixie or <br />U.S. 1, he did not know where they should locate. <br />Commissioner Lyons agreed we should encourage having a <br />tire store at this location rather than on North Gifford <br />Road. <br />Discussion continued re commercial uses in the area, <br />and the Chairman noted that possibly the additional rezoning <br />recommended by staff could go almost from South Gifford Road <br />adjacent to the railroad up to the C -1A at North Gifford <br />Road. Mr. Shearer pointed out that generally the C-lA area <br />is to the south of the subject property; to the north, it is <br />mostly R-2. <br />The Chairman asked if anyone present wished to be <br />heard. <br />Urias Forbes, owner of lots 5, 6, 7 and 8, Spruce Park <br />Subdivision, was in favor of the requested rezoning for <br />property east of the Florida East Coast railroad tracks and <br />Old Dixie, but he did not want Spruce Park, which is west of <br />18 <br />� � r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).