Laserfiche WebLink
MAR 211984 Boas 56 PA-cE481. <br />Commissioner Wodtke did not feel the auditing done by <br />May Zima allows them to answer all these questions in depth. <br />What this type of audit does is point out areas of weakness. <br />Mr. Moats noted that May Zima does a lot of govern- <br />mental auditing, and while they did not examine all the <br />detailed reports he did believe the County generally is <br />getting all the reports it needs. <br />Chairman Scurlock asked Finance Director Fry if we are <br />on a program now of setting up some kind of tickler file to <br />be sure we are receiving everything that we should as <br />required by Statute. <br />Mr. Fry stated that he does know we are getting all the <br />required reports from the Constitutional Officers, but he <br />has not researched about all the independent districts. <br />Commissioner Bird inquired whether in doing an audit on <br />the Sheriff, for instance, the auditor tracks the actual <br />seizing when a vehicle is confiscated and how the funds flow <br />from that to other purposes. <br />Mr. Moats stated that their audit doesn't go down to <br />tracking individual items. It does it in general, and that <br />is why they suggested some changes in the Sheriff's <br />accounting system. <br />Chairman Scurlock discussed the possibility of the <br />court awarding confiscated funds directly to the Commission <br />as we are the ones who release those funds for the Sheriff's <br />use. <br />Commissioner Bird felt in the case of money, that would <br />be very simple, but in the case of confiscated equipment, it <br />could pose a problem. Sometimes the Sheriff makes use of <br />the confiscated cars, and his people drive them or trade <br />them or sell them. <br />Administrator Wright noted that we have some of them. <br />Commissioner Lyons did feel that we need to know who <br />has what, and the Board continued to discuss the documenting <br />36 <br />