My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/4/1984 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1984
>
4/4/1984 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:24 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 4:40:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/04/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Chairman opened the hearing to the public and asked <br />if anyone present wished to be heard. <br />Doyle Vernon of 2324 SW 1st Pl., pointed out that it <br />has been stated that there is no accurate way to measure <br />sewage, but the cap has been set at 12,000 gallons. He did <br />not believe the majority will be using 12,000 gallons of <br />sewage when they are only using an average of 6,000 gallons <br />of water. He further did not believe the same cap is <br />equitable for multi -family such as Vista Royale, and wished <br />to know why the cap couldn't be set lower to be more <br />equitable. Mr. Vernon realized it is hard to provide an <br />ideal rate structure for everyone, but felt there could be <br />some improvement. <br />Mr. Raftelis informed Mr. Vernon that before. <br />establishing a cap, they conducted studies in various <br />counties in Florida similar to Indian River County where <br />they looked at residential consumption during the <br />non -irrigation months, based on the assumption that all <br />water returns to the sewer during those months. They started <br />with a cap of 6,000 gallons and moved up in increments of <br />1,000 to determine how much consumption would fall below <br />those figures. What they found was that approximately 95% <br />of consumption fell below the 15,000 gallon level, i.e., if <br />the cap was set at 15,000, you would be charging for 95% of <br />the water returned for the sewer. It was felt that was a <br />little high for the Indian River County area; so, they <br />bumped it down 3,000 gallons, and they have concluded that <br />by setting the cap at 12,000 gallons', we are picking up <br />anywhere from 95 to 98% of the water returned to the sewer. <br />Mr. Vernon brought up the example of a home owner on a <br />fixed income who will only use 3,000 or 4,000 gallons a <br />month; they are having to pay for sewer also when in reality <br />they are not using that much because they are watering <br />13 <br />� APR 41984 <br />BOOK 56 PAGE 6620 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.