4/11/1984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

M M commercial; it still is; and he has paid taxes on it as commercial; however, since it is not in compliance with the Land Use.Plan, Mr. Bardelis found that he could not develop it as commercial. Attorney Cairns pointed out that if you stand on U.S.I, you can see the subject property clearly, and he believed that proximity speaks against it going to R-lAA. At the southern tip of Block E, which is just northeast of it, there is a dirt road where the Ercildoune Bowling Alley and its parking lot are located. The property to the southeast is undeveloped, but may very well be included in the hospital node in the,future so that in all likelihood his client's property will be looking into commercial property. The reason the applicant wanted multiple was to build duplexes because he felt it would be easier to develop the property that way. Attorney Cairns pointed out that just because single family homes are built does not necessarily mean they will be owner occupied; they could be rental units also. He emphasized that duplexes are not necessarily eyesores, and stated that as an alternative, he would like to see the Board consider a classification of R -2A, which is multi -family but has a maximum density of 4 units per acre. Discussion followed re several possible alternatives, including rezoning four lots of the subject property to R-1 and leaving the one tip lot in R-2, rezoning four lots and leaving the tip lot C-1, or including all the property in one of the nodes and keeping it C-1. Chairman Scurlock stated that he favored Commissioner Bird's original suggestion, which was to redesignate to LD -2 and rezone to R-1, and he would like to determine the residents' reaction to that suggestion. Mrs. Clarice Hall, 8036 141st St., came before the Board representing property owners of Ercildoune Heights and Commissioner Bird explained that R-1 would limit structures 21 APR 11 IJ84 BOOK 56 PACE X65