Laserfiche WebLink
APR 11 1984 BOOK 56 PAGE 706 r <br />to single family but would allow up to 6 units per acre. He <br />noted that they are guaranteed, however, that it won't be <br />built at a density of 6 because of the platted lot size. The <br />LD -2 designation would make it consistent with the <br />Comprehensive Plan, and R-1 zoning would result in one <br />single family home on each lot. <br />Mrs. Hall stated that she could not speak for the <br />residents' feeling on this suggestion because this is the <br />first they have heard of it. She asked the property owners <br />present to stand up, and about 30 stood to denote that they <br />were opposed to the rezoning addressed today. Mrs. Hall <br />emphasized that they want single family dwellings and 3 <br />units per acre. She further stressed that all the people <br />present today are permanent residents; they love their <br />community; and want to keep it single family. Mrs. Hall <br />knew of no problem with the bowling alley or the noise from <br />U. S. 1, and her one objection, in addition to multiple <br />family dwelling, was to have people who are not living in <br />the subdivision asking to change it. Mrs. Hall then <br />submitted letters from eight residents of Ercildoune Heights <br />objecting to the proposed rezoning. The eight property <br />owners are listed as follows and their letters are on file <br />in the office of the Clerk. <br />June D. Welsh <br />Fred & Cecilia Bates <br />Anne and Angelo Barbieri <br />Mr. and Mrs. Everett Cane <br />George and Shirley Halcomb <br />Dr. and Mrs. William Richardson <br />.Carroll and Eugenia Moser <br />Adele Lapham <br />Chairman Scurlock believed what Mrs. Hall has said <br />would be pretty much in line with what Commissioner Bird is <br />suggesting. <br />22 <br />