My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/18/1984
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1984
>
4/18/1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:24 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 4:41:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/18/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APR 1 R 1984 Boa 56; FA6f U, . <br />the benefit of Indian River County at no cost to Indian River <br />County. Frizzell agrees not to claim any compensation whatsoever <br />for itself or any of its agents or employees for this study. <br />2. The original October 6, 1982 agreement contemplated <br />a much larger scope of work than that which is now desired by the <br />County Commission The rebate of the $40,000.00 lump sum fee for. <br />the Indian River County Criminal Justice Complex study was based <br />on a larger projected construction cost. The parties agree that <br />based on the scope of the Pinkerton Jail the County shall be <br />entitled to a rebate of one-half (1/2) the lump sum fee amounting <br />to $20,000.00 according to the following schedule: <br />Schematic Design,Phase $ 3,000.00 <br />Design Development Phase 4,000.00 <br />Construction Document Phase 8,000.00 <br />Bidding Negotiation Phase 1,000.00 <br />Construction Phase 4,000.00 <br />TOTAL $20,000.00 <br />Provided further, that County shall be entitled to the <br />remaining $20,000.00 rebate if with the same architect it proceeds <br />to construct what remains of the original scope of the project. <br />All additional work under the scope of the original project will <br />be credited on a pro -rata basis with the rebate. <br />3. The parties agree that compensation for completing <br />the schematic design phase of the contract with the Pinkerton Jail <br />concept to the satisfaction of the County Commission shall be as <br />follows: <br />a) In accordance with Article 15 of the contract, <br />6.784% times $4,083,900.00 equals $277,051.77 times 15% for sche- <br />matic design phase equals $41,557.77 (This figure is based on the <br />formula set forth in Article 15 of the contract based on the esti- <br />mated construction cost of the schematic design previously <br />approved by the Board of.County Commissioners.) <br />b) The parties agree that in accordance with Article 1 <br />Section 1.7, Additional Services, 1.7.13, the architect is enti- <br />tled to the additional amount of $6,489.50. <br />c) The parties agree that except as set forth in 3 (a) <br />and (b) above, the architect is not entitled to any other compen- <br />sation whatsoever from the County for completing the schematic <br />iI <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.