My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/2/1984
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1984
>
5/2/1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:24 AM
Creation date
6/4/2015 12:50:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/02/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MAY 21984 <br />BOOK 56 PAGE 042 E <br />Commissioner Wodtke thought it was going to be very <br />difficult to consider anything different than MXD along <br />there, and Director Keating explained that according to the <br />Comp Plan, property in MXDs should be zoned so it is in <br />conformance with the use of the property immediately around <br />it. He thought that if the MXD is extended along the entire <br />corridor, it would just prolong the necessity of making a <br />decision at the time of the Comp Plan amendment requests. <br />Attorney O'Haire pointed out that people east of the <br />Fleischman property have been told that they are in the <br />node, but up until this point Mr. and Mrs. Fleischman are <br />the first to ask that their property be included in the <br />node. <br />Commissioner Bird repeated his feelings that this area <br />will not be used for residential after the intersection at <br />U.S. #1 and Oslo Road is further developed. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Lyons, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, that the <br />Board designate the Fleischman property <br />as part of the commercial node at U.S. #1 and <br />Oslo Road and instruct the Planning staff to <br />rework that nodal area to include it. <br />Under discussion, Commissioner Wodtke urged that the <br />MXD designation be considered for sometime in the future as <br />a possible alternative that would afford us more flexibility. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. <br />The Motion was voted on and carried <br />unanimously (4-0). <br />46 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.