Laserfiche WebLink
it <br />MAY! 1984 Boa 57 PAGE 102 <br />Attorney Brandenburg noted that he needs authority to <br />issue the first work authorization under the Master <br />Agreement after negotiating the scope. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Lyons, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously (4-0) <br />gave the Attorney authorization as above. <br />REVERSE OSMOSIS PLANT MODIFICATION <br />Utility Services Director Pinto reviewed staff memo and <br />letter from Water Services of America dated April 19, 1984: <br />TO: The Honorable Members of DATE: May 9, 1984 FILE: <br />the Board of County Commissioners <br />THROUGH: Michael Wright <br />County AdministratorRO PLANT CAPACITY <br />SUBJECT: MODIFICATION <br />FROM: Terrance G. Wnt REFERENCES' 1) ISA Letter 3/29/84 <br />Utility Services Director �2) WSA Letter 4/19/ 8 <br />DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: <br />Because of a special offer from DuPont and Water Services of America, <br />Inc., who are the original suppliers of filter membranes for the <br />water plant, it is possible to add membranes to our existing system <br />at an extreme reduction in price. The Water Services of America <br />letters dated March 29 and April 19, 1984 explain this offer in <br />detail (Exhibits 1 & 2), <br />ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSES: <br />By taking advantage of this offer, we can increase the capacity of <br />the plant by 660,000 gallons per day or to 165,000gpd per rack(4 racks). <br />Our intention would be to install one rack in 1984 and three racks <br />in 1985. This would allow us to use the warranty to our best <br />advantage. <br />The alternative would be to purchase the membranes at the full <br />retail price at a future date. <br />FUNDING: <br />Funding will be from collected impact fees. <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />Staff recommends the Board authorize the staff to pursue this offer <br />and proceed with purchasing and installing the membranes as outlined <br />in this memo and the attached references. <br />.• <br />