Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously (4-0) <br />approved the settlement terms (Case No.'83-12) <br />as set out in the above memo and directed the <br />County Attorney's office to prepare same and <br />have the necessary documents recorded. <br />MASTER AGREEMENT WITH CARTER ASSOCIATES AND WILLIAMS, <br />HATFIELD & STONER, INC. - <br />Attorney Brandenburg reviewed the competitive <br />negotiation process followed in selecting a consulting <br />engineering firm for the wastewater master plan for the <br />County, in which process Carter Associates in conjunction <br />with Williams, Hatfield & Stoner came out as the number one <br />choice. They were approved by the Board at an earlier <br />meeting, and negotiations were begun. He continued that he <br />has a proposed master agreement for professional services, <br />which is an open ended agreement, i.e., the master agreement <br />spells out the general conditions between the engineer and <br />the County, and the County then would issue specific work <br />orders to the engineer laying out in each work order the <br />maximum amount of money for that work order and the hourly <br />rates and basis for the work to be done. Attorney <br />Brandenburg suggested that the Board move ahead with the <br />Master Agreement for professional services and authorize <br />staff to work on the first addendum for specific services to <br />be executed by the Chairman at such time as it is in form <br />satisfactory to staff. The reason for doing it this way is <br />that the SR 60 wastewater engineering area is critical, and <br />we do not want to lose any time. <br />Utilities Director Pinto and Administrator Wright <br />confirmed the urgency of having aImaster plan so that the <br />development on SR 60, whether done by the County or a <br />private group, will reflect what the master plan calls for, <br />SAY 16 1984 45 Boa 57 PACE 45 <br />A <br />