5/16/1984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mpy 16 1984 Boa 57 PnE 46 and Chairman Scurlock agreed that in any event, we need an overall master plan to provide services on a uniform basis, and time is very much of the essence. Commissioner Lyons stated that he would like to take a few minutes and read over the proposed Master Agreement. Attorney Brandenburg recommended that the Board members do so. He continued that staff is not comfortable with the way the first work authorization is worded as we want to be sure the SR 60 area is included as a priority; that is why they are not suggesting the Board approve the first work authorization today, but rather give the Chairman the authority to sign it when it is revised satisfactorily. The Attorney did, however, recommend the Board sign the Master Agreement for engineering services. Chairman Scurlock asked where the funding comes from for specific services, and Utilities Director Pinto stated that the Master Plan will be funded by the Utility Department and if there are any specific construction projects, then they would have to get authorization from the Board and that would be covered by impact fees. Administrator Wright believed we can fund it totally from the involved parties. Attorney Brandenburg commented that the County currently has consultants for a wastewater master plan and we are negotiating with water consultants and impact fee consultants. It obviously doesn't make sense for the County to have three different engineers doing the same work and coming up with three disconnected studies. Therefore, it is apparent we will have to get.all three consultants to work together and use the same premises; possibly only one should develop the data base, or all three develop it and put it in one computer system. It was agreed to defer action on the Master Agreement until later in the meeting. 46