My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/23/1984
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1984
>
5/23/1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:24 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 4:25:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/23/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Bou '57 <br />2. Determine existing wastewater flows at each of the eighty-one <br />wastewater treatment plants in the study area. This information <br />will be gathered without actual plant site visits. <br />3. Study the physical feasibility of 5 effluent disposal <br />alternates. The alternates to be studied are discharges to golf <br />courses, to mosquito improvement ditches, to surface wates, to <br />citrus groves and to percolation ponds. This phase will <br />identify any physical constraints that would eliminate a <br />particular method of effluent disposal in a given area. <br />4. Evaluate county owned sites as a possible central sludge <br />processing facility. <br />5. Determine force main routings that would result in lower <br />constuction costs. Characteristics to be considered are vehicle <br />traffic, existing easements or rights-of-way, ease to obtain <br />additional easements or right-of-way, pavement, disruption of <br />retail business, and other physical constraints affecting the <br />cost of laying pipe in the ground. <br />6. Meeting with various members of county staff during the three <br />week data gathering stage of. the project. Said meetings are to <br />be weekly and serve as status reports and a forum to receive <br />guidance. <br />C. Analysis and Study Phase <br />1. Analyze wastewater service for the County being -provided by two, <br />three and four wastewater treatment plants. <br />2. Analyze four force main/service area options for each .of the <br />three treatment plant options. <br />3. Analyze three effluent disposal options for the three most cost <br />effective options in item C.2. <br />4. Analyze the three most cost effective options to determine if <br />the year 2000 plan is cost effective as an interim wastewater <br />solution. <br />5. Analyze three sludge disposal options for the cost effective <br />plan. The option to be analyzed are composting, land <br />application, and landfilling. <br />D. Report Writing Phase <br />1. Produce a report which details the various options studied. The <br />report will discuss in detail the three most cost effective <br />options available to the County for a wastewater system. The <br />report will provide an implementation plan which will enable the <br />County to move forward from their present wastewater system to <br />the plan recommended in the report. <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />1142m/116P/040584 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.