Laserfiche WebLink
Attorney Stewart advised that St. Edward's School <br />believes that the Planning & Zoning Commission did not give <br />adequate consideration to the above mentioned provisions. <br />They feel that the proposed use and its impact on the school <br />were not considered and that adequate protective measures <br />were not incorporated into the plan in order to minimize the <br />impact on the school. He believed that it is the burden of <br />Hutchinson Utilities to bear the responsibility, cost, and <br />whatever else is involved, of being certain that the use <br />does not have an negative impact on the surrounding <br />property. <br />Attorney Stewart pointed out that the proposed site of <br />the plant is at the northeast corner of the Moorings <br />property and at the southeast corner of St. Edward's School, <br />adjacent to AIA. It has been alleged that the need for <br />construction of a new, enlarged wastewater treatment plant <br />is due to the necessity for removal of the existing plant, <br />which is located at the opposite end of the property. The <br />Moorings placed the existing wastewater treatment plant in <br />its current location and then proceeded to build its tennis <br />courts and club around it, making expansion of the plant <br />area physically difficult. It then transferrred <br />responsibility for operating these facilities to Hutchinson <br />Utilities, Inc. <br />Attorney Stewart then addressed separately the four <br />major concerns of St. Edward's School -- aerosols, odors, <br />noise, and aesthetics. <br />Aerosols <br />In regard to the effect of aerosols, Attorney Stewart <br />presented the following letter (Exhibit A) received from <br />Flora Mae Wellings, Sc.D., Director of Epidemiology Research <br />Center of the HRS dated April 13, 1984. <br />49 <br />L MAY 23 1984 <br />BOOK 57 PAGE 168 <br />