My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/13/1984
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1984
>
6/13/1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:24 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 4:27:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/13/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Administrator Wright thought that we need to make a• - <br />distinction between this group and the Overall Economic <br />Development Planning Committee, and Planning Director Robert <br />Keating explained that the formation of the OEDP Committee <br />resulted out of the County applying for EDP grants.. In <br />order to be eligible for those grants, the County was <br />required to have an Overall Economic Development Plan <br />prepared by a committee composed of members representing a <br />cross section of the community. He explained that the OEDP <br />committee will be more of a long-range planning committee <br />that will develop some specific strategy, but it would not <br />be a day to day committee. Administrator Wright thought <br />that one committee would compliment the other. <br />Intergovernmental Director Tommy Thomas pointed out in <br />regard to the ODEP Committee, that there is frequently a <br />borderline on what is quasi public and quasi private, as far <br />as industrial development is concerned. He noted there are <br />certain economic functions that might best be developed by <br />government -- not many, but there are some, particularly if <br />it is County -owned property. Basically, the goal of both <br />committees is to create employment. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. <br />The Motion was voted on and carried <br />unanimously (4-0). <br />DEMOLITION LIEN - MINNIS PROPERTY <br />Attorney Brandenburg explained that William Copeland <br />Minnis, Jr. originally approached Commissioner Lyons with <br />respect to removing a lien that was imposed on his property <br />by virtue of an unsafe building. Mr. Minnis is requesting <br />that the County waive interest that has accrued at 6% annum <br />since the lien was imposed in 1981. He is also suggesting <br />that he be allowed to pay the lien off in installments. <br />53 <br />3 <br />JUN 1 BOOK 57 FACE 448 <br />� X984 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.