Laserfiche WebLink
BOOK 57 Pm -H49,7 , <br />r- JUN 2 0 1994 <br />Administrator Wright stated that basically what he is <br />recommending is for someone to come in and give us an <br />outside appraisal on what we need to do with Fleet <br />Management to get it on a sound operating basis, as it is <br />currently running at a deficit. A consultant can also give <br />us an idea of how our operations compare to local private <br />and public operations. <br />Chairman Scurlock felt that something should be done <br />very quickly because participating constitutional officers <br />are actually paying more for car maintenance than they would <br />if they went to a privately -owned gas station. <br />Administrator Wright explained that the scope of <br />services would cover total operations, charges, staffing, <br />manpower, and the feasibility of farming out services. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Lyons, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Wodtke, that the <br />Board accept the County Administrator's <br />recommendation to advertise for a consultant <br />to do an in-depth study of the operation of <br />Fleet Management, at an amount not to exceed <br />$10,000, and to come back to the Board; with <br />funding to come from the users. <br />Commissioner Lyons wished to see an allocation of <br />overhead for all County departments --the Attorney's time, <br />the Administrator's time, etc. -- and he wondered if the <br />consultant could also do this sort of a job. Administrator <br />Wright stated that we have an overhead report from our <br />auditor which has been applied to the enterprise accounts, <br />but we have not applied this to the MSTU. He thought the <br />Commissioners would be painfully aware of overhead <br />allocation in about 30 days because it will be a major <br />budget discussion. <br />34 <br />� � r <br />